home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT1586>
- <title>
- July 13, 1992: Reviews:Television
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- July 13, 1992 Inside the World's Last Eden
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 77
- TELEVISION
- Minding Their Q's and A's
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By RICHARD ZOGLIN
- </p>
- <p> WHO: Bill Clinton, Ross Perot, George Bush
- WHERE: All Over the Dial
- </p>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: Never mind the issues; TV forums provide
- valuable glimpses of the candidates in action.
- </p>
- <p> Jay Leno's guests on Wednesday night were Geena Davis,
- Jackson Browne and Northern Exposure's Darren Burrows. "And,"
- the Tonight Show host announced with pride in a network promo,
- "no presidential candidates!"
- </p>
- <p> It was a rare respite. For weeks, Ross Perot and Bill
- Clinton have been taking their campaign to almost any TV studio
- that would open its doors, from the network morning shows to
- Arsenio Hall. Last week President Bush reluctantly joined the
- media blitz, fielding questions from everyday folks for an hour
- and a half on CBS This Morning. TV's talking heads have never
- been so garrulous.
- </p>
- <p> Some pundits are worried that these candidate Q-and-A
- sessions have supplanted regular newscasts with something less
- rigorous journalistically. The carping seems misguided. The
- citizen forums have not replaced the news; they have replaced
- other forms of campaigning. What's more, they compare favorably
- with more mainstream TV-news venues. When Barbara Walters talked
- with Bush on 20/20 not long ago, the encounter was so carefully
- stage-managed that her earnest voice-over ("The President's
- greeting was warm, his desk clear") sounded like parody. ABC's
- Peter Jennings aired a prime-time special last week on Perot,
- but the rehash of familiar material was merely a warm-up to the
- lively 1-hr. 40-min. "town meeting" that followed.
- </p>
- <p> Perot's appearances have the suspense of a good TV movie:
- Will the mysterious billionaire lose his composure and reveal
- a dark side? Perot made no obvious gaffes during the ABC forum,
- in which he fielded questions from studio-audience members in
- 10 cities. His testiness was apparent early on, when he opened
- the show by rebutting several points in the Jennings program.
- But he was surprisingly collected, though not particularly
- convincing, when a gay activist shouted out a denunciation of
- his stand on naming homosexuals to his Cabinet. (He is
- concerned, he said, that such a person would be "destroyed" in
- Senate confirmation hearings.)
- </p>
- <p> Perot's TV manner has its engaging side, sprinkled with
- the chummy colloquialisms of a small-town businessman ("You
- follow me?" "Pretty simple stuff, right?"). But his humble
- routine is growing less convincing with exposure. One questioner
- compared Perot to Jesse Jackson -- both have been criticized for
- lack of office-holding experience -- and asked why the Texas
- billionaire was any more qualified to be President. "I don't
- claim that I am," Perot replied. ``That's up to the people."
- Jennings prodded gently, "But surely you think you're
- qualified." Perot's response: "I'm not going to sit here and
- brag on myself," thus raising the question of why he was sitting
- there at all.
- </p>
- <p> Clinton's TV appearances seem both more smoothly
- presidential and more drably predictable. Taking call-in
- questions on NBC's Today show last Tuesday, Clinton had his act
- down pat, greeting each caller by name ("Good morning, Lucille")
- and giving carefully measured recitations on everything from
- education loans to women's rights. His class-president cool was
- broken just once, when an avowed supporter asked if Clinton
- would clear up his stance on the Gennifer Flowers allegations:
- "Just skip any weasel words and give us a direct answer."
- Clinton proceeded to repeat his familiar weasel words: Flowers'
- story about their alleged affair was "not the truth," the
- Clinton marriage has "had some troubles," he and his wife still
- "love each other very much."
- </p>
- <p> Compared with Bush in his stilted performance on CBS This
- Morning, however, Clinton looked like Bart Simpson. Instead of
- phoned-in questions, the President faced a polite group of
- people culled from the line waiting for a White House tour.
- Sitting in the Rose Garden, they were understandably reluctant
- to embarrass their host. Yet even Bush's programmed responses
- were revealing. For one thing, astute viewers learned that the
- President's phrase "Let me put that in perspective" is like a
- road sign: EVASIVE GENERALIZATION AHEAD. And Bush's tactic of
- touting his Administration's record at every turn seemed
- laughably transparent. "How are you helping the rain forest?"
- asked a little girl from Georgia. "By having the best
- environmental record of any country," replied the President.
- </p>
- <p> The chief complaint of this campaign season is that the
- candidates are avoiding "the issues." But the issues can be
- overrated. An hour or two of spontaneous give-and-take provides
- an important glimpse of the candidate in real, human
- interaction: a taste of his temperament, a reading of his
- sincerity, a feeling for how he relates to people and to
- pressure.
- </p>
- <p> Everyone is learning the game quickly. The most
- significant question of the campaign thus far may have come from
- Katie Couric, the host for Perot's two-hour call-in session on
- Today in mid-June. After he gave a waffling answer to a question
- about Social Security benefits, Couric shrewdly tossed the ball
- back to the caller: "Roberta, are you satisfied with that
- answer?" She wasn't, and Perot had to try again. Now more
- grass-roots questioners are probing with follow-ups, insisting
- on "specifics." At a time when TV journalism has come to the
- people, the people are learning to be journalists.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-